There is a really good post up
here regarding the things we as sysadmins see on a daily basis. All that is up there is 100% true.
But that’s not what I am here to post about.
What caught my eye was the title for his page. Two keywords caught my eye: “Inane” and “ramblings”. Let’s take a look at this:
If we do a dictionary lookup (Ever used the dictionary built into Microsoft Word? Bet you guys didn’t even know it was there…Go to Tools -> Research and select the dictionary from the drop down menu in the bar that appears on the right side. Goodness…=) on “inane”, this is what we get:
in·ane
- silly or unintelligent
- having little sense or importance
- insubstantial
- empty, insubstantial, or void
Is his work really inane? I thought there seemed to be a great deal of wisdom behind his latest piece. Surely he cannot feel that his own writings are insubstantial or empty, otherwise, why write them?
How about “ramblings”
ram·bling
- not to the point
- continuing for too long and with many changes of subject
A short paragraph brings the reader into his top ten list, of which every item precisely on point with the title of the piece. Again, rambling doesn’t fit.
You’re probably wondering what I’m getting at. Granted, I haven’t looked at all of his writing, but I’m pretty sure that “inane” and “rambling” don’t describe most of them. (I’ll give some leeway to “ramble”.)
There’s another word, “random” which isn’t mentioned but I think is almost definitely implied. How many people use “random” when describing their blog or journal? Or anything they say at all?
We learn in cryptography that true randomness is very hard to find. Even in the most complex of systems with millions of possible outcomes, it is still possible to derive a formula or statistical analysis and give some sort of weighted odd as to what will appear next. Unless your subject matter is chosen from a field of all possible subject matter in the universe, assigned a unique identifier which is matched to the pattern at which atoms undergo radioactive decay, your topic isn’t truly random.
But we don’t need to go that far. A little quick thinking can explain that we choose topics and say the things we do based on what we’re thinking about and what we’ve experienced. Sure, the subjects may change a bit, but I can be reasonably certain that there’s a better chance you’ll talk about last night’s football game over some obscure topic, say, effects of peppers in white turkey chili. Now you may decide to discuss white turkey chili, but depending on who you are, I’ll argue that statistically, the odds are stacked slightly towards football, even if you don’t talk about either of those. In short, very few blogs are “random”.
Even fewer are “inane”. No one writes stuff they think is inane. To put forth the effort to write such, you must attach some importance to it. (No one said anyone else had to find it important, however…=) If it’s important to you, it is certainly not “inane” to you. And I am willing to believe based on the popularity of livejournal and others and the millions of comments people post, at least someone out there doesn’t find it inane either. The fact that I found the link on Slashdot suggests to me that someone at that site didn’t find it inane, and went as far as to theorize that a good deal of Slashdot readers wouldn’t find it inane either. (Sure enough, there are 80 comments in response to the Slashdot post.)
I think descriptions such as “inane”, “rambling”, and “random” are too often used and totally inaccurate to describe 99% of the writings on the internet. While 99% of the writings on the internet may be total garbage, they certainly mean something to someone, (ruling out “inane”) and unless they’re suffering from a neurological disorder, they probably wrote the piece for a reason. (Ruling out “random”.)
I’ll give some leeway to “rambling” since there are many people who simply cannot stay on subject, or repeat themselves too many times. I’m sure I could qualify for that on occasion.
But what you won’t find here is any “random” or “inane” posts. I write for a reason. I write with a purpose. However insignificant those reasons and purposes may be, I am not typing at the whims of radioactive decay.